Monogamy and love are not cousins...
I have been researching on monogamy and today
I thought to share what I have discovered so far. Let me apologise in advance
for an offence that may be taken.
First of all I have concluded that to a
greater extent monogamy is not natural. If it were natural it would be easy,
but it’s not that’s why infidelity is probably the number one cause of
relationship break ups. Human beings do not naturally fit into the monogamy
shaped mould that society has imposed on them. Just to substantiate this
thought only 5% of all mammals are monogamous. The question that then came to
my mind was “if monogamy is not the natural option why has it been imposed far
and wide as the best possible relationship practise?” With that question in
mind, I sought to discover the origins of monogamy…
I am sorry to disappoint all the hopeless romantics
out there but the origins of monogamy have absolutely nothing to do with love
or romance. Human beings did not decide that they wanted to be with one partner
at a time because they loved them alone and wanted to be with no other. There are
three schools of thought surrounding the origins of monogamy and none of them
include the word love….
The first dates back to about 10 000 years
ago, where it is thought that humans resorted to monogamy to avoid infanticide.
Apparently men would kill other men’s babies to hurry the nursing mothers back to
fertility after child birth. So eventually
the fathers of new born babies decided to stick around with the new mother and
baby to safeguard them against other overzealous men.
Another school of thought is that humans
resorted to monogamy to safeguard their inheritances. there was need to have
children with unquestionable paternity to ensure that in the event that one
passes on their wealth remains in the rightful hands. What better way to do that
than have all our children with one partner as opposed to having a baby with Susan
who also has a baby with John.
The last theory which I think is a bit far-fetched
is that at some point in time, a long time ago, females were few and very
dispersed. So the man who was lucky enough to find a female would lay claim on
the female and take her as his own forever, in exchange he would protect and
provide for her. So much so that anyone who tried to take away this scarce
resource (the woman) would risk dying.
Nowadays with such a high prevalence of sexually transmitted infections and diseases, monogamy shows up again as the best way to protect oneself. A very effective solution indeed but still there is direct relationship between the decision to stay with one partner in order to avoid diseases and viruses AND LOVE.
Nowadays with such a high prevalence of sexually transmitted infections and diseases, monogamy shows up again as the best way to protect oneself. A very effective solution indeed but still there is direct relationship between the decision to stay with one partner in order to avoid diseases and viruses AND LOVE.
So there you have it, the origins of monogamy
were mainly centred around order, investment and protection not love and certainly
not nature. I mean, if were truly monogamous beings we would behave like the
geese that will have only one partner for life and in the event that the one
partner dies the remaining goose will never mate again!!!!



Comments
Post a Comment